Cuba vs Suriname: Prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29
Cuba
22.2
in 2023
Suriname
22.2
in 2023
Cuba rank
123rd
Suriname rank
123rd
Prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29 over time
- Cuba
- Suriname
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 22.2 against 22.2 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 123rd and Suriname ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.24 | 23.72 | 0.52 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 19.57 | 19.48 | 0.09 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 21.27 | 21.27 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29, Cuba or Suriname?
- Cuba, at 22.2 against 22.2 in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29 between Cuba and Suriname?
- 0, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Suriname?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Suriname rank globally for prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29?
- Cuba ranks 123rd and Suriname ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.