United Arab Emirates vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
United Arab Emirates
28.2
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27.5
in 2023
United Arab Emirates rank
80th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 28.2 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, United Arab Emirates averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.53 | 30.28 | 1.75 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 28.17 | 25.39 | 2.78 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 28.02 | 26.45 | 1.57 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, United Arab Emirates or Zimbabwe?
- United Arab Emirates, at 28.2 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 0.7, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.