Southern Africa (UNSDG) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Southern Africa (UNSDG)
31
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27.5
in 2023
Southern Africa (UNSDG) rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Southern Africa (UNSDG)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Southern Africa (UNSDG) currently reports 31 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.5.
That makes Southern Africa (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Southern Africa (UNSDG) ahead.
Southern Africa (UNSDG) ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 155 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Southern Africa (UNSDG) averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa (UNSDG) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.73 | 30.28 | 0.5452 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 26.72 | 25.39 | 1.33 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 29.82 | 26.45 | 3.37 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Southern Africa (UNSDG) or Zimbabwe?
- Southern Africa (UNSDG), at 31 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Zimbabwe?
- 3.5, with Southern Africa (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Southern Africa (UNSDG) ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.