Southern Africa (UNSDG) vs Uganda: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Southern Africa (UNSDG)
31
in 2023
Uganda
27.2
in 2023
Southern Africa (UNSDG) rank
84th
Uganda rank
85th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Southern Africa (UNSDG)
- Uganda
How they compare
Southern Africa (UNSDG) currently reports 31 against 27.2 in Uganda, a difference of 3.8.
That makes Southern Africa (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.
Southern Africa (UNSDG) ranks 84th and Uganda ranks 85th of 155 groups.
Southern Africa (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa (UNSDG) | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.73 | 29.63 | 0.1048 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 26.72 | 24.65 | 2.07 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 29.82 | 26.25 | 3.57 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Southern Africa (UNSDG) or Uganda?
- Southern Africa (UNSDG), at 31 against 27.2 in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Uganda?
- 3.8, with Southern Africa (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Uganda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Uganda rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Southern Africa (UNSDG) ranks 84th and Uganda ranks 85th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.