South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) vs Uruguay: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
South-eastern Asia (UNSDG)
24.19
in 2023
Uruguay
24.5
in 2023
South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) rank
110th
Uruguay rank
107th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- South-eastern Asia (UNSDG)
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 24.5 against 24.19 in South-eastern Asia (UNSDG), a difference of 0.31.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 110th and Uruguay ranks 107th of 155 groups.
South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.48 | 19.36 | 9.12 | South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 25.42 | 20.66 | 4.76 | South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 24.08 | 23.52 | 0.5532 | South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 24.5 against 24.19 in South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) and Uruguay?
- 0.31, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) and Uruguay rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- South-eastern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 110th and Uruguay ranks 107th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.