(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs)
31.19
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27.5
in 2023
(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
83rd

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs)
  • Zimbabwe
0102030200020112023

How they compare

(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) currently reports 31.19 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.69.

That makes (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs)'s figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) has been ahead every year.

(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 155 groups.

(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 31.36 30.28 1.08 (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs)
2010s 28.97 25.39 3.58 (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs)
2020s 30.31 26.45 3.86 (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) or Zimbabwe?
(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs), at 31.19 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) and Zimbabwe?
3.69, with (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/sdgrc-escwa-arab-middle-income-countries-mics/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/sdgrc-escwa-arab-middle-income-countries-mics/zimbabwe/">(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Middle-Income Countries (MICs) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed