(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU)
31
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27.5
in 2023
(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU)
  • Zimbabwe
0102030200020112023

How they compare

(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) currently reports 31 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.5.

That makes (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU)'s figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) ahead.

(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 155 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 29.73 30.28 0.5452 Zimbabwe
2010s 26.72 25.39 1.33 (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU)
2020s 29.82 26.45 3.37 (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) or Zimbabwe?
(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU), at 31 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) and Zimbabwe?
3.5, with (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do (SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/sdgrc-eca-southern-africa-customs-union-sacu/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/sdgrc-eca-southern-africa-customs-union-sacu/zimbabwe/">(SDGRC) ECA_Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed