(SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries vs Tanzania: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
(SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries
37.85
in 2023
Tanzania
38.8
in 2023
(SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries rank
31st
Tanzania rank
33rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 38.8 against 37.85 in (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries, a difference of 0.95.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tanzania ahead.
(SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries ranks 31st and Tanzania ranks 33rd of 155 groups.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.44 | 40.56 | 0.1159 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 36.42 | 37.05 | 0.6317 | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 37.12 | 38.08 | 0.9531 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 38.8 against 37.85 in (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries and Tanzania?
- 0.95, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries and Tanzania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries and Tanzania rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- (SDGRC) ECA_Mineral-rich countries ranks 31st and Tanzania ranks 33rd of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.