(SDGRC) ECA AMU vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
(SDGRC) ECA AMU
31.27
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27.5
in 2023
(SDGRC) ECA AMU rank
80th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- (SDGRC) ECA AMU
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
(SDGRC) ECA AMU currently reports 31.27 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.77.
That makes (SDGRC) ECA AMU's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, (SDGRC) ECA AMU has been ahead every year.
(SDGRC) ECA AMU ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 155 groups.
(SDGRC) ECA AMU has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | (SDGRC) ECA AMU | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.96 | 30.28 | 1.68 | (SDGRC) ECA AMU |
| 2010s | 29.71 | 25.39 | 4.32 | (SDGRC) ECA AMU |
| 2020s | 30.55 | 26.45 | 4.1 | (SDGRC) ECA AMU |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, (SDGRC) ECA AMU or Zimbabwe?
- (SDGRC) ECA AMU, at 31.27 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between (SDGRC) ECA AMU and Zimbabwe?
- 3.77, with (SDGRC) ECA AMU ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for (SDGRC) ECA AMU and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do (SDGRC) ECA AMU and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- (SDGRC) ECA AMU ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.