SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) vs Zambia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
SDG regions - Global (UNSDG)
30.69
in 2023
Zambia
27.1
in 2023
SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) rank
86th
Zambia rank
86th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- SDG regions - Global (UNSDG)
- Zambia
How they compare
SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) currently reports 30.69 against 27.1 in Zambia, a difference of 3.59.
That makes SDG regions - Global (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.
SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 86th of 155 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.5 | 31.66 | 3.16 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 28.05 | 26.41 | 1.64 | SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 29.91 | 26.6 | 3.31 | SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) or Zambia?
- SDG regions - Global (UNSDG), at 30.69 against 27.1 in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) and Zambia?
- 3.59, with SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) and Zambia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) and Zambia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- SDG regions - Global (UNSDG) ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 86th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.