Sao Tome and Principe vs (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Sao Tome and Principe
39.7
in 2023
(SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD
38.7
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
29th
(SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD rank
26th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 39.7 against 38.7 in (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD, a difference of 1.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 29th and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD ranks 26th of 194 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.45 | 42.92 | 3.53 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 40.57 | 38.86 | 1.71 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 39.42 | 38.28 | 1.15 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Sao Tome and Principe or (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 39.7 against 38.7 in (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Sao Tome and Principe and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD?
- 1, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 29th and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD ranks 26th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.