Peru vs Western Pacific (WHO regions): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Peru
21
in 2023
Western Pacific (WHO regions)
17.92
in 2023
Peru rank
137th
Western Pacific (WHO regions) rank
138th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Peru
- Western Pacific (WHO regions)
How they compare
Peru currently reports 21 against 17.92 in Western Pacific (WHO regions), a difference of 3.08.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Western Pacific (WHO regions)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 137th and Western Pacific (WHO regions) ranks 138th of 194 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Western Pacific (WHO regions) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.46 | 20.6 | 3.86 | Peru |
| 2010s | 18.43 | 17.8 | 0.6285 | Peru |
| 2020s | 20.12 | 17.58 | 2.55 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Peru or Western Pacific (WHO regions)?
- Peru, at 21 against 17.92 in Western Pacific (WHO regions) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Peru and Western Pacific (WHO regions)?
- 3.08, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Western Pacific (WHO regions)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Western Pacific (WHO regions) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Peru ranks 137th and Western Pacific (WHO regions) ranks 138th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.