Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Serbia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
28.87
in 2023
Serbia
24.9
in 2023
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
97th
Serbia rank
100th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
  • Serbia
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) currently reports 28.87 against 24.9 in Serbia, a difference of 3.97.

That makes Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 97th and Serbia ranks 100th of 155 groups.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 26.4 20.55 5.85 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
2010s 25.82 21.43 4.39 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
2020s 27.89 23.95 3.94 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) or Serbia?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), at 28.87 against 24.9 in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Serbia?
3.97, with Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Serbia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Serbia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 97th and Serbia ranks 100th of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Serbia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/serbia/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Serbia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed