Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Panama: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
28.87
in 2023
Panama
25.5
in 2023
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
97th
Panama rank
96th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
  • Panama
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) currently reports 28.87 against 25.5 in Panama, a difference of 3.37.

That makes Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 97th and Panama ranks 96th of 155 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 26.4 27.95 1.55 Panama
2010s 25.82 22.86 2.96 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
2020s 27.89 24.45 3.44 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) or Panama?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), at 28.87 against 25.5 in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Panama?
3.37, with Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Panama?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Panama rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 97th and Panama ranks 96th of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Panama: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/panama/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Panama: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed