Mozambique vs Southern Asia (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Mozambique
47
in 2023
Southern Asia (UNSDG)
49.3
in 2023
Mozambique rank
8th
Southern Asia (UNSDG) rank
6th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Mozambique
- Southern Asia (UNSDG)
How they compare
Southern Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 49.3 against 47 in Mozambique, a difference of 2.3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 8th and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 6th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Southern Asia (UNSDG) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Southern Asia (UNSDG) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.88 | 45.41 | 2.47 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 45.36 | 46.58 | 1.22 | Southern Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 46.27 | 48.62 | 2.35 | Southern Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Mozambique or Southern Asia (UNSDG)?
- Southern Asia (UNSDG), at 49.3 against 47 in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Mozambique and Southern Asia (UNSDG)?
- 2.3, with Southern Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Southern Asia (UNSDG)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Southern Asia (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Mozambique ranks 8th and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 6th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.