Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) vs Nepal: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions)
35.22
in 2023
Nepal
33.2
in 2023
Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) rank
53rd
Nepal rank
52nd

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions)
  • Nepal
010203040200020112023

How they compare

Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) currently reports 35.22 against 33.2 in Nepal, a difference of 2.02.

That makes Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions)'s figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.

Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 52nd of 155 groups.

Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 31.92 31.54 0.376 Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions)
2010s 33.02 31.91 1.11 Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions)
2020s 34.55 32.77 1.78 Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) or Nepal?
Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions), at 35.22 against 33.2 in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) and Nepal?
2.02, with Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) and Nepal?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) and Nepal rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 52nd of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) vs Nepal: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/middle-east-and-north-africa-world-bank-regions/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/middle-east-and-north-africa-world-bank-regions/nepal/">Middle East and North Africa (World Bank regions) vs Nepal: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed