Micronesia (UNSDG) vs Romania: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Micronesia (UNSDG)
24.55
in 2023
Romania
24.3
in 2023
Micronesia (UNSDG) rank
108th
Romania rank
108th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Micronesia (UNSDG)
- Romania
How they compare
Micronesia (UNSDG) currently reports 24.55 against 24.3 in Romania, a difference of 0.25.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Micronesia (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (UNSDG) ranks 108th and Romania ranks 108th of 155 groups.
Micronesia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (UNSDG) | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.56 | 21.13 | 0.4311 | Micronesia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 21.97 | 21.32 | 0.6451 | Micronesia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 23.7 | 23.43 | 0.2781 | Micronesia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Micronesia (UNSDG) or Romania?
- Micronesia (UNSDG), at 24.55 against 24.3 in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Micronesia (UNSDG) and Romania?
- 0.25, with Micronesia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (UNSDG) and Romania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Micronesia (UNSDG) and Romania rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Micronesia (UNSDG) ranks 108th and Romania ranks 108th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.