Mexico vs New Zealand: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Mexico
13.2
in 2023
New Zealand
12.4
in 2023
Mexico rank
189th
New Zealand rank
191st
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Mexico
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 13.2 against 12.4 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.8.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 189th and New Zealand ranks 191st of 194 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.7 | 9.04 | 5.66 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 10.76 | 9.88 | 0.88 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 12.47 | 11.72 | 0.75 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Mexico or New Zealand?
- Mexico, at 13.2 against 12.4 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Mexico and New Zealand?
- 0.8, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and New Zealand rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Mexico ranks 189th and New Zealand ranks 191st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.