Maldives vs (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Maldives
43.4
in 2023
(SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS
40.32
in 2023
Maldives rank
21st
(SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS rank
20th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Maldives
- (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 43.4 against 40.32 in (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS, a difference of 3.08.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS ahead.
Maldives ranks 21st and (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS ranks 20th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 2 and (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.33 | 49.21 | 3.88 | (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS |
| 2010s | 44.02 | 43.32 | 0.7024 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 43.35 | 40.46 | 2.89 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Maldives or (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS?
- Maldives, at 43.4 against 40.32 in (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Maldives and (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS?
- 3.08, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Maldives and (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Maldives ranks 21st and (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS ranks 20th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.