Maldives vs (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Maldives
43.4
in 2023
(SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS
39.8
in 2023
Maldives rank
21st
(SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS rank
23rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Maldives
- (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 43.4 against 39.8 in (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS, a difference of 3.6.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS ahead.
Maldives ranks 21st and (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS ranks 23rd of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 2 and (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.33 | 46.49 | 1.16 | (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS |
| 2010s | 44.02 | 40.11 | 3.91 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 43.35 | 39.36 | 3.99 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Maldives or (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS?
- Maldives, at 43.4 against 39.8 in (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Maldives and (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS?
- 3.6, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Maldives and (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Maldives ranks 21st and (SDGRC) ECA_ECCAS ranks 23rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.