Malawi vs (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Malawi
32.4
in 2023
(SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states
33.66
in 2023
Malawi rank
58th
(SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states rank
61st
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Malawi
- (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states
How they compare
(SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states currently reports 33.66 against 32.4 in Malawi, a difference of 1.26.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 58th and (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states ranks 61st of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.53 | 27.94 | 2.59 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 27.42 | 28.62 | 1.2 | (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states |
| 2020s | 31 | 32.36 | 1.36 | (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Malawi or (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states?
- (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states, at 33.66 against 32.4 in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Malawi and (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states?
- 1.26, with (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Malawi ranks 58th and (SDGRC) ECA_Small Island states ranks 61st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.