Libya vs East Timor: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Libya
29.3
in 2023
East Timor
29.7
in 2023
Libya rank
74th
East Timor rank
72nd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates) over time
- Libya
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 29.7 against 29.3 in Libya, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.
Libya ranks 74th and East Timor ranks 72nd of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.98 | 30.84 | 0.86 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 28.16 | 28.01 | 0.15 | Libya |
| 2020s | 28.75 | 28.85 | 0.1 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Libya or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 29.7 against 29.3 in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Libya and East Timor?
- 0.4, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and East Timor?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Libya and East Timor rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Libya ranks 74th and East Timor ranks 72nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.