Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Nauru: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions)
19.96
in 2023
Nauru
22.5
in 2023
Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank
122nd
Nauru rank
122nd

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions)
  • Nauru
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 22.5 against 19.96 in Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions), a difference of 2.54.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) ahead.

Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 122nd and Nauru ranks 122nd of 155 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) Nauru Difference Ahead
2000s 22.54 19.45 3.09 Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions)
2010s 17.98 19.63 1.65 Nauru
2020s 19.22 21.6 2.38 Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) or Nauru?
Nauru, at 22.5 against 19.96 in Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Nauru?
2.54, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Nauru?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Nauru rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 122nd and Nauru ranks 122nd of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Nauru: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-unicef-prog-regions/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-unicef-prog-regions/naoero/">Latin America and the Caribbean (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Nauru: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed