Laos vs Libya: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Laos
28.6
in 2023
Libya
29.3
in 2023
Laos rank
77th
Libya rank
74th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates) over time
- Laos
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 29.3 against 28.6 in Laos, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 77th and Libya ranks 74th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.94 | 29.98 | 3.96 | Laos |
| 2010s | 29.9 | 28.16 | 1.74 | Laos |
| 2020s | 28.38 | 28.75 | 0.375 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Laos or Libya?
- Libya, at 29.3 against 28.6 in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Laos and Libya?
- 0.7, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Libya?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Libya rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Laos ranks 77th and Libya ranks 74th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.