North Korea vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
North Korea
27.5
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27.5
in 2023
North Korea rank
83rd
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates) over time
- North Korea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 27.5 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
North Korea ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Korea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.64 | 30.28 | 0.64 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 27.72 | 25.39 | 2.33 | North Korea |
| 2020s | 27.23 | 26.45 | 0.775 | North Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, North Korea or Zimbabwe?
- North Korea, at 27.5 against 27.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between North Korea and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do North Korea and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- North Korea ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.