Kiribati vs Uganda: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Kiribati
26.9
in 2023
Uganda
27.2
in 2023
Kiribati rank
88th
Uganda rank
85th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Kiribati
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 27.2 against 26.9 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.
Kiribati ranks 88th and Uganda ranks 85th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.21 | 29.63 | 4.42 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 24.86 | 24.65 | 0.21 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 26.15 | 26.25 | 0.1 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Kiribati or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 27.2 against 26.9 in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Kiribati and Uganda?
- 0.3, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Uganda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Uganda rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Kiribati ranks 88th and Uganda ranks 85th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.