Jamaica vs Latvia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Jamaica
21.5
in 2023
Latvia
21.4
in 2023
Jamaica rank
132nd
Latvia rank
134th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Jamaica
- Latvia
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 21.5 against 21.4 in Latvia, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 134th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.43 | 19.79 | 2.64 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 18.63 | 19.55 | 0.92 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 20.57 | 20.88 | 0.3 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Jamaica or Latvia?
- Jamaica, at 21.5 against 21.4 in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Jamaica and Latvia?
- 0.1, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Latvia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Jamaica ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 134th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.