Iraq vs Southern Africa (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Iraq
27.1
in 2023
Southern Africa (UNSDG)
31
in 2023
Iraq rank
86th
Southern Africa (UNSDG) rank
84th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Iraq
- Southern Africa (UNSDG)
How they compare
Southern Africa (UNSDG) currently reports 31 against 27.1 in Iraq, a difference of 3.9.
That makes Southern Africa (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 86th and Southern Africa (UNSDG) ranks 84th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Southern Africa (UNSDG) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Southern Africa (UNSDG) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.74 | 29.73 | 1.01 | Iraq |
| 2010s | 26.57 | 26.72 | 0.1546 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 26.6 | 29.82 | 3.22 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Iraq or Southern Africa (UNSDG)?
- Southern Africa (UNSDG), at 31 against 27.1 in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Iraq and Southern Africa (UNSDG)?
- 3.9, with Southern Africa (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Southern Africa (UNSDG)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Southern Africa (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Iraq ranks 86th and Southern Africa (UNSDG) ranks 84th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.