Ghana vs Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Ghana
36
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions)
36.68
in 2023
Ghana rank
42nd
Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions) rank
39th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Ghana
- Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions)
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions) currently reports 36.68 against 36 in Ghana, a difference of 0.68.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 42nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions) ranks 39th of 194 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.75 | 40.56 | 5.19 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 39.6 | 35.93 | 3.67 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 36.12 | 36.09 | 0.031 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Ghana or Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions), at 36.68 against 36 in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Ghana and Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions)?
- 0.68, with Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Ghana ranks 42nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank regions) ranks 39th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.