Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) vs Peru: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Europe and Northern America (UNSDG)
17.34
in 2023
Peru
21
in 2023
Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) rank
139th
Peru rank
137th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Europe and Northern America (UNSDG)
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 21 against 17.34 in Europe and Northern America (UNSDG), a difference of 3.66.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Europe and Northern America (UNSDG)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) ranks 139th and Peru ranks 137th of 155 groups.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.48 | 24.46 | 11.98 | Peru |
| 2010s | 13.81 | 18.43 | 4.62 | Peru |
| 2020s | 16.37 | 20.12 | 3.76 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) or Peru?
- Peru, at 21 against 17.34 in Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) and Peru?
- 3.66, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) and Peru?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) and Peru rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Europe and Northern America (UNSDG) ranks 139th and Peru ranks 137th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.