Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Palestine: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions)
27.71
in 2023
Palestine
24.8
in 2023
Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank
101st
Palestine rank
103rd

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions)
  • Palestine
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) currently reports 27.71 against 24.8 in Palestine, a difference of 2.91.

That makes Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions)'s figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Palestine ahead.

Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 101st and Palestine ranks 103rd of 155 groups.

Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 26.06 25.93 0.1298 Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions)
2010s 25.33 24.02 1.31 Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions)
2020s 26.88 24.38 2.5 Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) or Palestine?
Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions), at 27.71 against 24.8 in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Palestine?
2.91, with Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Palestine?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Palestine rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 101st and Palestine ranks 103rd of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Palestine: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/europe-and-central-asia-unicef-prog-regions/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/europe-and-central-asia-unicef-prog-regions/west-bank-and-gaza/">Europe and Central Asia (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Palestine: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed