ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) vs Namibia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)
28.87
in 2023
Namibia
24.9
in 2023
ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) rank
97th
Namibia rank
100th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)
  • Namibia
0102030200020112023

How they compare

ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) currently reports 28.87 against 24.9 in Namibia, a difference of 3.97.

That makes ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)'s figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) has been ahead every year.

ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) ranks 97th and Namibia ranks 100th of 155 groups.

ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 26.4 22.55 3.85 ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)
2010s 25.82 19.56 6.26 ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)
2020s 27.89 23.35 4.54 ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) or Namibia?
ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE), at 28.87 against 24.9 in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) and Namibia?
3.97, with ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) and Namibia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) and Namibia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) ranks 97th and Namibia ranks 100th of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) vs Namibia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide/namibia/">ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) vs Namibia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed