Equatorial Guinea vs (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Equatorial Guinea
41.3
in 2023
(SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD
38.7
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
26th
(SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD rank
26th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 41.3 against 38.7 in (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD, a difference of 2.6.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD ranks 26th of 194 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.69 | 42.92 | 4.77 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 42.36 | 38.86 | 3.5 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 41.15 | 38.28 | 2.87 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Equatorial Guinea or (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 41.3 against 38.7 in (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Equatorial Guinea and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD?
- 2.6, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th and (SDGRC) ECA_CEN-SAD ranks 26th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.