ECLAC_Latin America vs Suriname: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
ECLAC_Latin America
19.92
in 2023
Suriname
22.2
in 2023
ECLAC_Latin America rank
127th
Suriname rank
125th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- ECLAC_Latin America
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 22.2 against 19.92 in ECLAC_Latin America, a difference of 2.28.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times ECLAC_Latin America's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
ECLAC_Latin America ranks 127th and Suriname ranks 125th of 155 groups.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECLAC_Latin America | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.51 | 23.72 | 1.21 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 17.95 | 19.48 | 1.53 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 19.18 | 21.27 | 2.1 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, ECLAC_Latin America or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 22.2 against 19.92 in ECLAC_Latin America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between ECLAC_Latin America and Suriname?
- 2.28, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECLAC_Latin America and Suriname?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do ECLAC_Latin America and Suriname rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- ECLAC_Latin America ranks 127th and Suriname ranks 125th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.