ECLAC_Carribean vs Niue: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
ECLAC_Carribean
23.09
in 2023
Niue
24
in 2023
ECLAC_Carribean rank
114th
Niue rank
111th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- ECLAC_Carribean
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 24 against 23.09 in ECLAC_Carribean, a difference of 0.91.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was ECLAC_Carribean ahead.
ECLAC_Carribean ranks 114th and Niue ranks 111th of 155 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, ECLAC_Carribean averaged higher in 1 and Niue in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECLAC_Carribean | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.56 | 21.82 | 2.74 | ECLAC_Carribean |
| 2010s | 20.5 | 21.56 | 1.06 | Niue |
| 2020s | 22.28 | 23.2 | 0.9199 | Niue |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, ECLAC_Carribean or Niue?
- Niue, at 24 against 23.09 in ECLAC_Carribean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between ECLAC_Carribean and Niue?
- 0.91, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECLAC_Carribean and Niue?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do ECLAC_Carribean and Niue rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- ECLAC_Carribean ranks 114th and Niue ranks 111th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.