ECLAC_All countries vs Naoero: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
ECLAC_All countries
19.96
in 2023
Naoero
22.5
in 2023
ECLAC_All countries rank
123rd
Naoero rank
122nd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- ECLAC_All countries
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 22.5 against 19.96 in ECLAC_All countries, a difference of 2.54.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times ECLAC_All countries's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was ECLAC_All countries ahead.
ECLAC_All countries ranks 123rd and Naoero ranks 122nd of 155 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, ECLAC_All countries averaged higher in 1 and Naoero in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECLAC_All countries | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.54 | 19.45 | 3.09 | ECLAC_All countries |
| 2010s | 17.98 | 19.63 | 1.65 | Naoero |
| 2020s | 19.22 | 21.6 | 2.38 | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, ECLAC_All countries or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 22.5 against 19.96 in ECLAC_All countries as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between ECLAC_All countries and Naoero?
- 2.54, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECLAC_All countries and Naoero?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do ECLAC_All countries and Naoero rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- ECLAC_All countries ranks 123rd and Naoero ranks 122nd of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.