ECE_Euro area (EMU) vs Mongolia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
ECE_Euro area (EMU)
15.22
in 2023
Mongolia
19.1
in 2023
ECE_Euro area (EMU) rank
148th
Mongolia rank
149th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- ECE_Euro area (EMU)
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.1 against 15.22 in ECE_Euro area (EMU), a difference of 3.88.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times ECE_Euro area (EMU)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
ECE_Euro area (EMU) ranks 148th and Mongolia ranks 149th of 155 groups.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECE_Euro area (EMU) | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.46 | 22.36 | 11.9 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 11.56 | 19.44 | 7.88 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 14.27 | 18.78 | 4.51 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, ECE_Euro area (EMU) or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 19.1 against 15.22 in ECE_Euro area (EMU) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between ECE_Euro area (EMU) and Mongolia?
- 3.88, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE_Euro area (EMU) and Mongolia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do ECE_Euro area (EMU) and Mongolia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- ECE_Euro area (EMU) ranks 148th and Mongolia ranks 149th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.