ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) vs Uruguay: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
26.23
in 2023
Uruguay
24.5
in 2023
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) rank
104th
Uruguay rank
107th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
  • Uruguay
0102030200020112023

How they compare

ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) currently reports 26.23 against 24.5 in Uruguay, a difference of 1.73.

That makes ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)'s figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) has been ahead every year.

ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ranks 104th and Uruguay ranks 107th of 155 groups.

ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 23.18 19.36 3.82 ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
2010s 23.08 20.66 2.42 ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
2020s 25.25 23.52 1.73 ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) or Uruguay?
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS), at 26.23 against 24.5 in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) and Uruguay?
1.73, with ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) and Uruguay?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) and Uruguay rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ranks 104th and Uruguay ranks 107th of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) vs Uruguay: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/ece-eastern-europe-caucasus-and-central-asia-cis/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/ece-eastern-europe-caucasus-and-central-asia-cis/uruguay/">ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) vs Uruguay: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed