ECE_CIS (CWG) vs Palestine: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
ECE_CIS (CWG)
26.18
in 2023
Palestine
24.8
in 2023
ECE_CIS (CWG) rank
105th
Palestine rank
103rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- ECE_CIS (CWG)
- Palestine
How they compare
ECE_CIS (CWG) currently reports 26.18 against 24.8 in Palestine, a difference of 1.38.
That makes ECE_CIS (CWG)'s figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Palestine ahead.
ECE_CIS (CWG) ranks 105th and Palestine ranks 103rd of 155 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, ECE_CIS (CWG) averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECE_CIS (CWG) | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.05 | 25.93 | 2.88 | Palestine |
| 2010s | 22.99 | 24.02 | 1.03 | Palestine |
| 2020s | 25.2 | 24.38 | 0.8202 | ECE_CIS (CWG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, ECE_CIS (CWG) or Palestine?
- ECE_CIS (CWG), at 26.18 against 24.8 in Palestine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between ECE_CIS (CWG) and Palestine?
- 1.38, with ECE_CIS (CWG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE_CIS (CWG) and Palestine?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do ECE_CIS (CWG) and Palestine rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- ECE_CIS (CWG) ranks 105th and Palestine ranks 103rd of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.