Eastern Asia (UNSDG) vs Ecuador: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Eastern Asia (UNSDG)
16.02
in 2023
Ecuador
20.2
in 2023
Eastern Asia (UNSDG) rank
146th
Ecuador rank
144th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Eastern Asia (UNSDG)
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 20.2 against 16.02 in Eastern Asia (UNSDG), a difference of 4.18.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Eastern Asia (UNSDG)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 146th and Ecuador ranks 144th of 155 groups.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia (UNSDG) | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.68 | 22.35 | 3.67 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 15.68 | 18.47 | 2.79 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 15.62 | 19.68 | 4.06 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Eastern Asia (UNSDG) or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 20.2 against 16.02 in Eastern Asia (UNSDG) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Eastern Asia (UNSDG) and Ecuador?
- 4.18, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia (UNSDG) and Ecuador?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Asia (UNSDG) and Ecuador rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Eastern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 146th and Ecuador ranks 144th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.