Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Kazakhstan: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
32.02
in 2023
Kazakhstan
30.5
in 2023
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank
69th
Kazakhstan rank
66th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
  • Kazakhstan
010203040200020112023

How they compare

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) currently reports 32.02 against 30.5 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.52.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ahead.

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 69th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 155 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 32.02 30.99 1.03 Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
2010s 28.69 29.12 0.4349 Kazakhstan
2020s 30.98 30 0.9835 Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) or Kazakhstan?
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions), at 32.02 against 30.5 in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Kazakhstan?
1.52, with Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Kazakhstan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Kazakhstan rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 69th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Kazakhstan: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/eastern-and-southern-africa-unicef-prog-regions/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/eastern-and-southern-africa-unicef-prog-regions/kazakhstan/">Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Kazakhstan: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed