Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) vs North Macedonia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG)
18.73
in 2023
North Macedonia
21.5
in 2023
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) rank
132nd
North Macedonia rank
132nd

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG)
  • North Macedonia
0510152025200020112023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 21.5 against 18.73 in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG), a difference of 2.77.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) ahead.

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 132nd and North Macedonia ranks 132nd of 155 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 21.33 15.4 5.93 Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG)
2010s 18.56 17.53 1.03 Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG)
2020s 18.37 20.43 2.06 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 21.5 against 18.73 in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) and North Macedonia?
2.77, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) and North Macedonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) and North Macedonia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 132nd and North Macedonia ranks 132nd of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) vs North Macedonia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia-unsdg/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia-unsdg/north-macedonia/">Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (UNSDG) vs North Macedonia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed