East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) vs North Macedonia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions)
18.69
in 2023
North Macedonia
21.5
in 2023
East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) rank
133rd
North Macedonia rank
132nd

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions)
  • North Macedonia
0510152025200020112023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 21.5 against 18.69 in East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions), a difference of 2.81.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) ahead.

East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) ranks 133rd and North Macedonia ranks 132nd of 155 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 21.2 15.4 5.8 East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions)
2010s 18.47 17.53 0.9423 East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions)
2020s 18.32 20.43 2.11 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 21.5 against 18.69 in East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) and North Macedonia?
2.81, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) and North Macedonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) and North Macedonia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) ranks 133rd and North Macedonia ranks 132nd of 155 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) vs North Macedonia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/east-asia-and-pacific-world-bank-regions/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/east-asia-and-pacific-world-bank-regions/north-macedonia/">East Asia and Pacific (World Bank regions) vs North Macedonia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed