Czechia vs ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Czechia
24.6
in 2023
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
26.23
in 2023
Czechia rank
106th
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) rank
104th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Czechia
  • ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
0102030200020112023

How they compare

ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) currently reports 26.23 against 24.6 in Czechia, a difference of 1.63.

That makes ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)'s figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 106th and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ranks 104th of 194 countries.

ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) Difference Ahead
2000s 20.8 23.18 2.38 ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
2010s 21.47 23.08 1.61 ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
2020s 23.73 25.25 1.53 ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Czechia or ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)?
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS), at 26.23 against 24.6 in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Czechia and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)?
1.63, with ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Czechia and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Czechia ranks 106th and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ranks 104th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/czechia/ece-eastern-europe-caucasus-and-central-asia-cis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/czechia/ece-eastern-europe-caucasus-and-central-asia-cis/">Czechia vs ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed