Cuba vs ECLAC_Latin America: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Cuba
22.2
in 2023
ECLAC_Latin America
19.92
in 2023
Cuba rank
125th
ECLAC_Latin America rank
127th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Cuba
- ECLAC_Latin America
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 22.2 against 19.92 in ECLAC_Latin America, a difference of 2.28.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times ECLAC_Latin America's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 125th and ECLAC_Latin America ranks 127th of 194 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | ECLAC_Latin America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.24 | 22.51 | 1.73 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 19.57 | 17.95 | 1.62 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 21.27 | 19.18 | 2.1 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Cuba or ECLAC_Latin America?
- Cuba, at 22.2 against 19.92 in ECLAC_Latin America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Cuba and ECLAC_Latin America?
- 2.28, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and ECLAC_Latin America?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and ECLAC_Latin America rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Cuba ranks 125th and ECLAC_Latin America ranks 127th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.