Cook Islands vs ECLAC_Carribean: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Cook Islands
23.9
in 2023
ECLAC_Carribean
23.09
in 2023
Cook Islands rank
112th
ECLAC_Carribean rank
114th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Cook Islands
- ECLAC_Carribean
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 23.9 against 23.09 in ECLAC_Carribean, a difference of 0.81.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was ECLAC_Carribean ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 112th and ECLAC_Carribean ranks 114th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 2 and ECLAC_Carribean in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | ECLAC_Carribean | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.68 | 24.56 | 2.88 | ECLAC_Carribean |
| 2010s | 21.41 | 20.5 | 0.9051 | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 23.15 | 22.28 | 0.8699 | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Cook Islands or ECLAC_Carribean?
- Cook Islands, at 23.9 against 23.09 in ECLAC_Carribean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Cook Islands and ECLAC_Carribean?
- 0.81, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and ECLAC_Carribean?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and ECLAC_Carribean rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Cook Islands ranks 112th and ECLAC_Carribean ranks 114th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.