Congo vs World Bank (lower middle income): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Congo
46.7
in 2023
World Bank (lower middle income)
43.81
in 2023
Congo rank
9th
World Bank (lower middle income) rank
10th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Congo
- World Bank (lower middle income)
How they compare
Congo currently reports 46.7 against 43.81 in World Bank (lower middle income), a difference of 2.89.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times World Bank (lower middle income)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 9th and World Bank (lower middle income) ranks 10th of 194 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | World Bank (lower middle income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.19 | 43.09 | 12.1 | Congo |
| 2010s | 49.67 | 42.28 | 7.39 | Congo |
| 2020s | 46.92 | 43.28 | 3.65 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Congo or World Bank (lower middle income)?
- Congo, at 46.7 against 43.81 in World Bank (lower middle income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Congo and World Bank (lower middle income)?
- 2.89, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and World Bank (lower middle income)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and World Bank (lower middle income) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Congo ranks 9th and World Bank (lower middle income) ranks 10th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.