Congo vs Southern Asia (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Congo
46.7
in 2023
Southern Asia (UNSDG)
49.3
in 2023
Congo rank
9th
Southern Asia (UNSDG) rank
6th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Congo
- Southern Asia (UNSDG)
How they compare
Southern Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 49.3 against 46.7 in Congo, a difference of 2.6.
That makes Southern Asia (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 9th and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 6th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Southern Asia (UNSDG) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Southern Asia (UNSDG) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.19 | 45.41 | 9.78 | Congo |
| 2010s | 49.67 | 46.58 | 3.09 | Congo |
| 2020s | 46.92 | 48.62 | 1.7 | Southern Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Congo or Southern Asia (UNSDG)?
- Southern Asia (UNSDG), at 49.3 against 46.7 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Congo and Southern Asia (UNSDG)?
- 2.6, with Southern Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Southern Asia (UNSDG)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Southern Asia (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Congo ranks 9th and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 6th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.