Central Asia (UNSDG) vs Libya: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Central Asia (UNSDG)
31.97
in 2023
Libya
29.3
in 2023
Central Asia (UNSDG) rank
71st
Libya rank
74th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Central Asia (UNSDG)
- Libya
How they compare
Central Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 31.97 against 29.3 in Libya, a difference of 2.67.
That makes Central Asia (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Central Asia (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
Central Asia (UNSDG) ranks 71st and Libya ranks 74th of 155 groups.
Central Asia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia (UNSDG) | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.88 | 29.98 | 6.9 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 31.74 | 28.16 | 3.58 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 31.46 | 28.75 | 2.71 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Central Asia (UNSDG) or Libya?
- Central Asia (UNSDG), at 31.97 against 29.3 in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Central Asia (UNSDG) and Libya?
- 2.67, with Central Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia (UNSDG) and Libya?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia (UNSDG) and Libya rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Central Asia (UNSDG) ranks 71st and Libya ranks 74th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.