Central Asia (UNSDG) vs Georgia: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Central Asia (UNSDG)
31.97
in 2023
Georgia
30.2
in 2023
Central Asia (UNSDG) rank
71st
Georgia rank
69th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Central Asia (UNSDG)
- Georgia
How they compare
Central Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 31.97 against 30.2 in Georgia, a difference of 1.77.
That makes Central Asia (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Central Asia (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
Central Asia (UNSDG) ranks 71st and Georgia ranks 69th of 155 groups.
Central Asia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia (UNSDG) | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.88 | 31.96 | 4.92 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 31.74 | 29.75 | 1.99 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 31.46 | 29.75 | 1.71 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Central Asia (UNSDG) or Georgia?
- Central Asia (UNSDG), at 31.97 against 30.2 in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Central Asia (UNSDG) and Georgia?
- 1.77, with Central Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia (UNSDG) and Georgia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia (UNSDG) and Georgia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Central Asia (UNSDG) ranks 71st and Georgia ranks 69th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.